doesn't read that way
"The former defence minister is suing Ms Higgins and her fiance David Sharaz for defamation in the Supreme Court of Western Australia over social media utterances."
https://www.news.com.au/national/cou...1ed641200e6695
To be continued...
Defamation is a farce. It's just a way for already privileged and entitled people to get money of other privileged and entitled people so they can buy themselves yet another investment property.
If defamation was for real then Bazza from the pub should sue Dazza from the pub for telling the other blokes in the pub that Bazza is a weak as piss drinker and has got a small dick and the court would award him three slabs of VB as compensation
Linda Reynolds is an incompetent, lying cunt.
She can sue me now.
Agree that defamation law is a circus
But still the main problem in this whole case is how you and I had to fork out $2.4 million to this lady. I hope this is fully investigated
It’s a slap in the face to all tax payers watching these 2 grubs living it up in France.
Her smug boyfriend looks like he could do with a swift uppercut to the chin.
Brucey is clearly a bit of a grub that got thrown under the bus.
Brittany has buyers remorse and saw an opportunity to cash in.
David is an opportunistic leech with delusions of grandeur.
You can picture Brittany waking up on that couch with Bruce's swimmers leaking out of her snapper.
All just my opinion though.
they should all be sent to a room and let Hayabi be the arbiter
Happy to be corrected but I think that Reynolds can claim her legal expenses from the crown as she was a minister at the time. On the other hand Higgins will have to fund her own defence. Rooter was right - defamation is a farce.
On a side note, I think the BF of Brittany's wears women's spectacle frames. They just look so odd on his face.
Good observation.
Let's discuss the naivety of their actions. The other creepy thing about him was how he thought he was so well connected, and dealt with the problem like it was some sort of layman's tactics session, (where are the financial kickbacks and nasty paybacks possible?) instead of the lady just going to the police, NOT involving two media journalists on the side, and avoiding every single bit of this side circus
New boyfriend:
'Let's sit down at a cafe and brainstorm this. I'm a dealer at the table of justice.
Let's bring the media into this, like TV show host and feminist, Lisa Wilkinson. Let's go!
What could go wrong darling, I'm a mover. I'm a shaker baby'
Noone with any brains would invite a media publicity lover to sit at the table as you navigate a tragedy
Not only that. Apparently one of the pair confided their story to ANOTHER senior journalist, Samantha Maiden, from the Australian newspaper. Well before the case had gone to a proper court trial. Is that smart? Hell no
In fact their actions almost constituted 'prejudicing a jury' and aborting a trial
'See darling. I have earned you a book deal. We are in total control. Let's cash in baby. The whole Me Too movement is ours. We can't lose, baby'
Nasty, petty and a novice in the real world. Small man in a big city, fighting a bigger battle than he initially comprehended. What qualifications does he have to take on very powerful forces? Naive and doing his gf a disservice imho