Quote Originally Posted by Max Impact View Post
Why is it that when a review is negative then it's assumed to be more true than a positive review?

As it is, NIC has retracted his comments. I believe Cisco's review and that he is indeed in love again.
...it's not that when a review is negative it's more believable than a positive review...it all comes down to credibility. Some are true punters where some lose some, and some win some. And then there are other punters that ALWAYS (seem) like they have a winning hand - lucky bastards.