Audrey - Starfish princess

[4some]

Duncan is probably overseas recruiting more talents at the moment !!

unless James and jack were lying to me, they told me that Duncan had considered my complaint about Audrey. So he knew about it.

[yellow_fever]

Okay. Then they would certainly pay taxes. Just clarifying that.

Yeah I'm sure they declare every penny. Just as sure as I am that all the girls hold the relevant visas and have PAYG taxes withheld at the appropriate rates, so they can fill in their tax returns at EOFY and claim industry specific deductions as appropriate under the position of "prostitute" which they fill out appropriately. No doubt they are paying appropriate amounts of public liability and workers comp too, I'm sure the girls all receive contributions to their superannuation also.

Or maybe they just receive cash money in return for swallowing your cum just like every other girl in the industry ;-)

[RoyalFlush]

Being in an agency business myself, I know how hard it is to appease customers on one-end and try to deliver good products on the other end from the supplier. Especially when you have no control over the quality of the goods, in this case how the girls perform. But a big chunk of the review I read from OP is due to the middleman being complacent with the room hygiene, confusion with the venue and poor customer service.
IMHO, if a customer's complain is being handled well, it will make a hell lot of difference. Some customers may understand this is a quality issue from the supplier, may be an isolated, once-off case and will give the agency another go knowing the middleman got their back in times of trouble.

Internet based, outcall businesses like MOC and Bluemoon rely heavily on online advertisement and word-of-mouth to get their name out there. I dont even think MOC invests much in SEO and Adwords. Im pretty sure forums like syd99 is an important avenue for these agencies to get customers. When revenue drops drastic enough, they will be compelled to address this issue.

I have nothing against MOC, in fact when you ran the naming competition 2 year ago you offered me a free punt which I didnt take. But everyone is throwing in their 2 cents, and I needed my daily rant, so I might as well throw in my 1 cent

[rm85]

Or maybe they just receive cash money in return for swallowing your cum just like every other girl in the industry ;-)

Uh huh.. See, the thing about operating in a state where sex work is legal and regulated is that if you are breaking the rules you're one of a lot fewer targets. But sure, let's just assume they are basically human traffickers dodging taxes. In that case I suppose 4some has more permanent means to seek redress as a consumer, right? Or any unsatisfied customer, for that matter.

Just saying.

EDIT: That was a rhetorical suggestion, to be clear. My argument is if MOC wasn't at least *mostly* on the level, any one grumpy fella could burn the whole thing down. Therefore it probably is. It's almost a variation on the anthropic principle. :P

Whether the women pay taxes, I wouldn't know.. but any licensed escort agency that isn't declaring income would be a pretty ripe target.

[Max Impact]

Uhm, I thought Audrey had a great body and a very pleasant face. She gave me everything I wanted including DFK but excluding CIM and anal that I didn't ask for cos it wasn't advertised. That I could fuck a girl like that at a whim with $350 in my pocket makes me love Sydney.

What happened to her before 4some saw her is anyone's guess. But I still want to see her again for curiosity.

Oh and I'm looking at a pic of Tedy on Viber and I still say she is super cute.

Has anyone else seen Audrey?

[fggd]

Being in an agency business myself, I know how hard it is to appease customers on one-end and try to deliver good products on the other end from the supplier. Especially when you have no control over the quality of the goods, in this case how the girls perform. But a big chunk of the review I read from OP is due to the middleman being complacent with the room hygiene, confusion with the venue and poor customer service.
IMHO, if a customer's complain is being handled well, it will make a hell lot of difference. Some customers may understand this is a quality issue from the supplier, may be an isolated, once-off case and will give the agency another go knowing the middleman got their back in times of trouble.

Internet based, outcall businesses like MOC and Bluemoon rely heavily on online advertisement and word-of-mouth to get their name out there. I dont even think MOC invests much in SEO and Adwords. Im pretty sure forums like syd99 is an important avenue for these agencies to get customers. When revenue drops drastic enough, they will be compelled to address this issue.

I have nothing against MOC, in fact when you ran the naming competition 2 year ago you offered me a free punt which I didnt take. But everyone is throwing in their 2 cents, and I needed my daily rant, so I might as well throw in my 1 cent

I agree with this - the overall experience is important, sometimes it's easy to be turned off by room hygiene amenities and take out on the girl even though the girl may not be that bad. There are times the girl is so great that can make up for the "not so good" part, but there are times the girl is just average or make the whole experience worse...
I use to go to MOC a lot to see a couple of my favorite girls that I know I guarantee get a fantastic booking - not only sex but also mood lifting. However seems some quality moc girls either left or not on roster anymore so I haven't been back lately. I though still hope MOC address issues and be good again.

[CunningLinguist]

Uh huh.. See, the thing about operating in a state where sex work is legal and regulated is that if you are breaking the rules you're one of a lot fewer targets. But sure, let's just assume they are basically human traffickers dodging taxes. In that case I suppose 4some has more permanent means to seek redress as a consumer, right? Or any unsatisfied customer, for that matter.

Just saying.

EDIT: That was a rhetorical suggestion, to be clear. My argument is if MOC wasn't at least *mostly* on the level, any one grumpy fella could burn the whole thing down. Therefore it probably is. It's almost a variation on the anthropic principle. :P

Whether the women pay taxes, I wouldn't know.. but any licensed escort agency that isn't declaring income would be a pretty ripe target.

They have changed apartments a few times ...

[HotSha19]

I too have had two less than valued experiences with this shop in the last three weeks. I wasn't going to post my experiences as I assumed ( wrongly) that mine were isolated cases. First up was linfi and at least she was into the sex and responded well to all my fairly routine requests. But in the end it was just a routine root for twice the price?! The second experience was last Thursday evening with a girl I won't mention as I ended up feeling rather sorry for her. She's dealing with some fairly serious family shit back home in Taipai and basically that's all I heard about for an hour. Time was up before I was even allowed to lay a hand on her!

Now, given the chorus of concerns being voiced I'll be a bit more cautious with my spending in this segment of the industry - it seems as though there's some changes afoot and I suspect some consolidation on the horizon.
Now if only I could get Sharena to not stand me up next time I make a booking, I'll at least feel as though I've managed to move on. Though give the prompt response I've just received Next week I feel will be Natalie's turn.

babe im really really sorry i been having thecnical issue with my contact number,,,,

[birch]

No problem Sharena. I'll try again soon!

[4some]

It is terrible when a once good shop's quality takes a dive and unfortunately once loyal punters end up being/feeling ripped off. Like any type of fee for service arrangement, I think it's best to do what any consumer should do, vote with your feet by walking away. In the end, it's our hard-earned cash.

I agree with you 100%. Poor service and short changing on time is a big no no. Even being short changed 10 minutesfor a booking that costs $350/hour works out to be almost $60.

[rooter]

Audrey the Starfish Princess - sounds like a character from Guardians of the Galaxy

[tarl1975]

MOC will probably not respond to this as it will just die down after a while unless bro 4some keep bringing it up... talking from past experience!

[4some]

MOC will probably not respond to this as it will just die down after a while unless bro 4some keep bringing it up... talking from past experience!

LOL - the expression, "like a dog at a bone" springs to mind...

[Zeth99]

i have a few thoughts on MOC that ive been holding onto..now is probably a good time to share them i guess

MOC pros
-best WL ive ever seen was at MOC - PORYA
-They have had a few other VERY GOOD girls - SK (personal top 10), Dior (very Good)
-ive never had any hygiene issues with the rooms

MOC cons
-some VERY BAD girls (in my opinion)
-Tedy - good bbbj, but terrible looks and couldnt provide sex because she said she was sore (fair enough, but should have given me a discount. i didnt ask for one btw because i was like meh). Max Impact bro im very suprised that you described her as cute - we must have VERY different standards..no offence seriously
-i think sometimes the MOC descriptions are very deceptive - there is one girl that has some very big and visible scars. Now when girls can only be booked for 2 or 3hrs information this SIGNIFICANT should be told upfront to the customer. I dont want to name the girl because i actually liked her, but i found this very deceptive of MOC management, and i wouldnt have booked her for if i knew this. Yes buyer beware, but i don't think its reasonable for me to have to ask "does the girl have any massive scars, goiters etc etc" before booking each time


TLDR - MOC is very inconsistent and lately there have been more misses than hits. When you're paying premium prices the bad punts really hurt. MY PERSONAL ADVICE - DONT SEE A MOC GIRL UNLESS SHE HAS AT LEAST 2 OR 3 GOOD REVIEWS FROM REVIEWERS WHO SEEM TO HAVE THE SIMILAR STANDARDS AS YOURSELF.

This tread has me worried now...i was looking forward to trying MOC for the first time as I really like the look/sound of Tedy.....but to now read she couldnt even provide sex??...whats the point of paying that price for nothing

[4some]

I don't think you need to worry. The answer is in this thread...

[IExperiment]

i have a few thoughts on MOC that ive been holding onto..now is probably a good time to share them i guess

MOC pros
-best WL ive ever seen was at MOC - PORYA
-They have had a few other VERY GOOD girls - SK (personal top 10), Dior (very Good)
-ive never had any hygiene issues with the rooms

MOC cons
-some VERY BAD girls (in my opinion)
-Tedy - good bbbj, but terrible looks and couldnt provide sex because she said she was sore (fair enough, but should have given me a discount. i didnt ask for one btw because i was like meh). Max Impact bro im very suprised that you described her as cute - we must have VERY different standards..no offence seriously
-i think sometimes the MOC descriptions are very deceptive - there is one girl that has some very big and visible scars. Now when girls can only be booked for 2 or 3hrs information this SIGNIFICANT should be told upfront to the customer. I dont want to name the girl because i actually liked her, but i found this very deceptive of MOC management, and i wouldnt have booked her for if i knew this. Yes buyer beware, but i don't think its reasonable for me to have to ask "does the girl have any massive scars, goiters etc etc" before booking each time


TLDR - MOC is very inconsistent and lately there have been more misses than hits. When you're paying premium prices the bad punts really hurt. MY PERSONAL ADVICE - DONT SEE A MOC GIRL UNLESS SHE HAS AT LEAST 2 OR 3 GOOD REVIEWS FROM REVIEWERS WHO SEEM TO HAVE THE SIMILAR STANDARDS AS YOURSELF.

Ah I remember Porya ...lol... I ussually dont get wild but one night at the Star Suite with her I did ...lol....
After our play in the shower and getting really clean we did a 69 mind you I dont eat many girls but this one why not
While in 69 I probe her ass with my finger she was still sucking and she realize and get scared and turn around ....lol....
hhmmm Porya that was memory and I guess she was a Legend and I am glad to have actually meet her in the past.
Thanks Max
I hope she is doing well and have a happy life.

[4some]

We all love negativity and cynicism. That's why this thread has as many hits as my review of Audrey from days ago.

Hi Max - I don't think in the case of this thread it's that people love negativity. I think it is because people can sympathise and relate to what has happened. and in the past people have been hesitant to speak out so openly...

[Max Impact]

Hi Max - I don't think in the case of this thread it's that people love negativity. I think it is because people can sympathise and relate to what has happened. and in the past people have been hesitant to speak out so openly...

I am stating from my past observations that a negative review will always rate it's socks off.

[CunningLinguist]

I am stating from my past observations that a negative review will always rate it's socks off.

Like this did!

[lockhart]

We all have different taste/expectation and one's hate could be the others' beloved...

Own experience value most.