Reply With QuoteBecareful when u have sex with whores!
No kissing, no daty, no fingering, no hj, no bbbj, no cbj no vaginal or anal sex with or without condom.
Give her your money, and wank while she talks dirty to u
Hi brothers:
I am new to this forum and i really need some help here, i went to my first punt 13weeks ago, a little details, it was my first time, a taiwan lady close to 30 yo, very skinny, we started with a shower then we kissed, she gave me a BBBJ and vagina sex with a condom, she wasnt quite into it so i got soften during the sex, she CBJ and ride on me again for abit then i asked her to finish it off by hand with the condom on still, at the end she took away the condom and wiped for me, since then i was so worried about the bBBJ part also the part when she was removing the condom and today its 3months my test turned out negetive, does it means i m clean clean or i should dp another one in 4months?
Please help me aka the upset brother
Becareful when u have sex with whores!
No kissing, no daty, no fingering, no hj, no bbbj, no cbj no vaginal or anal sex with or without condom.
Give her your money, and wank while she talks dirty to u
Stop harassing new brothers ! Hahaha !Originally Posted by 8inches
Directory of After Reports by wilisno
http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...ectory+reports
Collections of frequently used Abbreviations
http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...-Abbreviations
Problems arising from BBBJ don't take 3 months to surface, now that you've been tested clean, you're clean !
Directory of After Reports by wilisno
http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...ectory+reports
Collections of frequently used Abbreviations
http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...-Abbreviations
The doctor said in sum rare cases ppl only get tested after 6months that freaks me out
This is funny, you are asking this question on the forum.
While, nice and easy google search. Less than 1 second, and press enter. And you get all you need from government websites.
100% accurate.
One of the most notorious types of "sensitive questions" on the forum.
Dunno why, but it is somewhat "popular" these days.
Search : Oral Sex HIV infection
4 words and one enter. Bang!
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/qa/transmission.htm
"Yes, it is possible for either partner to become infected with HIV through performing or receiving oral sex, though it is a less common mode of transmission than other sexual behaviors (anal and vaginal sex). There have been a few cases of HIV transmission from performing oral sex on a person infected with HIV. While no one knows exactly what the degree of risk is, evidence suggests that the risk is less than that of unprotected anal or vaginal sex.
If the person performing oral sex has HIV, blood from their mouth may enter the body of the person receiving oral sex through
the lining of the urethra (the opening at the tip of the penis);
the lining of the vagina or cervix;
the lining of the anus; or
directly into the body through small cuts or open sores.
If the person receiving oral sex has HIV, their blood, semen (cum), pre-seminal fluid (pre-cum), or vaginal fluid may contain the virus. Cells lining the mouth of the person performing oral sex may allow HIV to enter their body.
The risk of HIV transmission increases
if the person performing oral sex has cuts or sores around or in their mouth or throat;
if the person receiving oral sex ejaculates in the mouth of the person performing oral sex; or
if the person receiving oral sex has another sexually transmitted disease (STD).
Not having (abstaining from) sex is the most effective way to avoid HIV.
If you choose to perform oral sex, and your partner is male,
use a latex condom on the penis; or
if you or your partner is allergic to latex, plastic (polyurethane) condoms can be used.
Studies have shown that latex condoms are very effective, though not perfect, in preventing HIV transmission when used correctly and consistently. If either partner is allergic to latex, plastic (polyurethane) condoms for either the male or female can be used. For more information about latex condoms, see "Male Latex Condoms and Sexually Transmitted Diseases."
If you choose to have oral sex, and your partner is female,
use a latex barrier (such as a natural rubber latex sheet, a dental dam, or a cut-open condom that makes a square) between your mouth and the vagina. A latex barrier such as a dental dam reduces the risk of blood or vaginal fluids entering your mouth. Plastic food wrap also can be used as a barrier.
If you choose to perform oral sex with either a male or female partner and this sex includes oral contact with your partners anus (analingus or rimming),
use a latex barrier (such as a natural rubber latex sheet, a dental dam, or a cut-open condom that makes a square) between your mouth and the anus. Plastic food wrap also can be used as a barrier."
Hey Bro. I would think the Dr is going to be giving you the best medical advice, not anyone here. Good to hear you tested negative.
The key for brothers being 'blood from the mouth'... If a WL gives you a BBBJ and she has no blood in her mouth then you can't contact HIV correct ?
When you are negative then you are clean
1. What freaks me out more is that some people never get tested.
2. What really freaks me out is the lack of knowledge people have on STI's.
3. What totally freaks me out is the lack of knowledge people have on things in general.
Don't you think that, as bro threemonth already saw a doctor, that the best source for information would have been at hand right then and there?
Be careful out there when searching the internet for information.
Some people have a hard time (refer to point 3 above) distinguishing trustworthy sources of information (government websites, possibly?) from the untrustworthy ones.
Does that include the ATO website?
And as a born skeptic, I am sometimes when looking at the information on government websites reminded on the agendas that some government are trying to push when they put that information there.
It seems to depend on the government (you did not specify a country or a state) and who's in power at the time.
Please note that the above skepticism is mostly founded when looking at information other than health related.
I must note though, that I find the information on the webpages of NSW Health trustworthy!
Couple of useful links:
Infectious diseases A to Z
Sexually transmitted diseases factsheets
If after reading through those you still want to leave the comfort of your home (let-a-lone go punting) I guess you have managed to understand that living in all it's forms poses a risk of dying. And in the end we all will face it.
Then again, home is a dangerous place as well. That's where most people die.
to the OP if you are worried so much about getting HIV from a BBBJ then fucking whores is probably not something for you..........i say this because of all the risks, HIV would probably be the lowest % risk STD you can get from a BBBJ there are many more that are much more common and you'll worry yourself too much to get any enjoyment
And as you can see bro Jj999, people may have difficulties in deciphering the 100% accurate information you quoted.
That is probably because the people who wrote that CDC article don't know it themselves for sure:
"While no one knows exactly what the degree of risk is..."
And are thus giving the only advice they can to well and truly avoid getting HIV from sex:
"Not having (abstaining from) sex is the most effective way to avoid HIV."
Government organisations are notoriously good at writing text (code, law, call it what you want) that regular people have hard time understanding.Deciphering
1. Convert (a text written in code, or a coded signal) into normal language.
2. Succeed in understanding, interpreting, or identifying (something).
Mate.
My point was. Why are this guy asking for a piece of information which he have received from a doctor.
Also, asking information about HIV transmission in a sex forum, is not a good way to get information.
Unless he had hidden agenda that requires us as punters to respond.
I'm not accusing anyone. I'm just saying this isn't a good place to get that information.
After extensive research on this matter bro.
I've got these facts, you may believe or not, you can prove it yourself, I hope this would answer all of future questions regarding this matter.
I will skip all of "incomprehensible" language the scientists used.
- Most risky sexual activity is unprotected anal (in our own vocabulary, GREEK)
- Even a protected anal, still carry risk, because the event of broken condom is more likely to happen. (THIS IS from the Scientist. Not me.)
- Most common is unprotected vaginal. Vaginal means pussy dick intercourse.
- Scientists can not establish the risk for oral sex, particularly for fellatio (BBBJ). The risk assigned is 0-0.04%.
Why? Because only one study returned result of there is transmission through oral sex. And using magic of mathematic, which I don't consider important to discuss here, that study spit that 0.04% out.
That study with 0.04%, was done for gay. And they said, fellatio, most probably isn't the only risky thing they do.
For the rest, there isn't any reported case for transmission through oral sex.
however, THEORITICALLY, it is possible. Therefore, they always say, the risk is extremely low.
It is theoritically possible, but there isn't any reported case which might be caused by various different factors.
Essentially, they are saying:
"It is theoritically possible, however, there is no reported case. And there is no harm in using protection for fellatio, because fellatio may transmit other STD such as Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, etc.
Open wound in mouth, sore gum, cum in mouth, etc. will increase the risk.
Again, there isn't any reported case in our study even though it is THEORITICALLY possible.
So let's say, the risk is 0-0.04%"
Also one more thing, the girls have "theoritically higher" risk of infected than men.
Finally, WE (punters) have THEORITICALLY lower risk of HIV transmission through fellatio.
Fellatio = BBBJ
If you want super safe, use latex condom.
That's it.
However, using latex condom does not mean that you are 100% free of HIV infection.
But practically 0. That's still the safest way, safest barrier for sex.
The safest way to avoid HIV is not to have sex.
(Serious, this last sentence was included in some paragraphs)
CDC is not Australian. That's US'.
Centre for Disease Control and Prevention.
If you guys don't believe in what the yankees have said, please look for Australian website yourself.
I do believe those Yankees.
By the way, the purpose of my first post was to show how easy and fast to use google.
And you can search better and credible information on the matter.
You can actually read the discussion of scientists, on the matter of HIV Transmission and specifically, Oral Sex.
Regarding HIV transmission through BBBJ.
can you or can't you?
That's yours to decide. And I encourage you to do some research yourself.
Did the scientsts recommend where you can get the best BBBJ ? Did they mention Styles ?
Directory of After Reports by wilisno
http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...ectory+reports
Collections of frequently used Abbreviations
http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...-Abbreviations
That's the killer punch, gold jerry !Did the scientsts recommend where you can get the best BBBJ ? Did they mention Styles ?
No. They didn't, those poor guys got aroused and had orgasms through debating on how to define this "theoritically possible". And convert it to number which is quite complex, 0 - 0.04%.Did the scientsts recommend where you can get the best BBBJ ? Did they mention Styles ?
Lol.
It's never easy to be a scientist !
Directory of After Reports by wilisno
http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...ectory+reports
Collections of frequently used Abbreviations
http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...-Abbreviations
The fact that she was 'very skinny' is a dead giveaway that she's got AIDS. I'd get tested again in 3 months time and then in a year. HIV can lie dormant for many years.
Peace Mate!
My intention was not to dispute your post that was obviously made with good intentions to help the fellow punters.
And yes, government websites are a better source of information in this matter (not in who's got the best BJ) than punting forums.
No argument there!
Thus I included the links to NSW Health websites (which in my opinion explain the things in a language better suited for regular people).
My points were:
- as you pointed out yourself, he already saw a doctor, a much better source for information than punting forum.
- some of the bros here cannot speak English well enough to be able to read the scientific gargle. Thanks for deciphering it!
(They may find similar websites on their own language though)
- google may also find sources like this forum
I know what CDC is. I used to work for them.
Still I don't always believe the Yankees.
Though I must admit that CDC is from the most reliable end of the spectrum (and not only in US).
And I was not at any point disputing the reliability of the information on their website. Maybe I should have been more clear on that.
Yet again, I agree. This forum is not the most reliable source of information (other than punting information).
But when you read the OP's post, do you think he is likely to read through discussions of scientists, especially in English.
So my sincere thanks to you, bro Jj999, for pasting that info here and also deciphering it!
Maybe it will help some who would not otherwise get the information.
Posting Permissions
|
|
|
|
