By accepting her as a GF or partner or whatever status you assign as long as it involved the so called "heart".
You also accept, the fact that, she works for money. Not for a real sex.


Once, I read a sexology column on weekend edition of a newspaper, written by a famous sexologist in a country somewhere in Asia.
He was considered the top brain for 'marriage' sexual issues in that particular country, where sex is still considered as somewhat taboo to be discussed so openly in public. (Now you know why the 'marriage'.)
However, he manages to do just that for years. Talk shows, health programme, newspaper articles, anything possible you name it. His name was considered as synonymous with sex, not in vulgar way, but a wise man, a wise husband (well this is the stereotype of that country, so please pardon me for bringing that taboo words to Brothels/agencies forum) .



He said that sex for married couple (at least that's what is morally allowed in that particular country) isn't just body to body skin to skin contact.
It's also a form of communication.
Marriage (or any adult relationship, sex isn't outlawed) isn't going to hold without enough communication. And sex is one of them.



Based on the wise thoughts of that guy, I constructed an opinion.
When you accept a WL as your partner or anything more than just a friend or anything that you would have "heart" or "love" word involved at some point.
You also accept that, she had sex with other guys, only because the money consideration in the form of hourly rate.
And those would not constitute a 'communication' of a couple.
Provided of course they didn't develop or didn't try to develop a higher level of "you-know-what-I'm-gonna-put-here".
If you couldn't differ that 'money consideration sex' to yours, perhaps you should consider everything.




Then you can say, If I find WLs and it was just sex okay. No communication.
Well then be honest with yourself with following statement:

- you and your partner (sex worker having more experience with opposite sex. And more experience and time in communicating with opposite sex.)
Which one, you would consider as easier to change heart and love another opposite sex?
If you say she's more prone to change of heart.
Then explain to her, not in a reply to this comment, why you aren't prone to that.
And of course it's hard to explain. And it's actually harder than explaining to a non-WL partner, because a WL partner knows everything, environment, your punting activity. Hey you met her as her customer, didn't you?

- do you think, a WL, would think a guy he met in a shop is 100% believable in dealing with another WL? However you present your excuses for seeing another WLs?

What do you think about yourself? Have you put yourself in her shoes?

Do you think you can handle other WLs more than her handling customers without hurting the other?
Other --> you and/or her.

This is something rather difficult to resolve. And can only be proven by means of one's action, rather than rubbishes spitted out of one's mouth.
She had enough of rubbishes from customers. She knows words mean nothing. Words are words. Actions are the real thing.
I'd say this would need time. And a long one. Not weekly/monthly. I'd say count it in semesters.
And a single problem would trashes efforts done for semesters.

- Provided(and assumed) that she didn't after visa, money, or anything.
Would she fall in love so easily for a guy? Why would it be you when there are others who visit her at that shop? Why are you special.
So unless you have the face of the most handsome man ever born on the earth, whoever it is, what features do you think she liked about you? Dick size? Able to make her orgasm? Sex techniques?

Are those things she liked were your personality and/or the comfortable feeling you can give to her when you are outside the shop. Or anything.

Oh man. They are human. Not cold-hearted machine. A perfect human. More experienced with life I'd say, than most of us.



Phew. Another boring lengthy post.
But hey, I got nothing to do, so thanks for providing the space.

If you feel sick reading my username because it's synonymous with lengthy posts, so be it. I love it, and this forum allowed no maximum characters. There is a minimum number of characters for a post actually.
I'm interpreting that one: you are somewhat encouraged to post more characters than less.


That's hundreds of words,
And just 2 cents worth of monetary benefit,

Cheers,